|Focus and Scope|
|Peer review process|
|Indexing & Abstracting|
|Screening for plagiarism|
All manuscripts must be submitted electronically through the e-mail to the editor at firstname.lastname@example.org. A manuscript number will be mailed to the corresponding author on same day or within 24 hours. There is no page limit. The submitting author takes responsibility for the paper during submission and peer review.
Already have a Username/Password for JHSSR?
Go to Login
Need a Username/Password?
Go to Registration
Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of current submissions.
Download journal template here.
Peer Review Process and policy
I. The submitted manuscript will be peer-reviewed according to the internationally accepted moral standards of scientific publication.
II. Editor in Chief will receive the manuscript. The Editor in Chief will decide one of the members of the section editor be the editor of the manuscript based on a field study of the manuscript (section editor member's field of expertise).
III. Authors should receive acknowledgment of receipt of their manuscript after one to two weeks of submission.
IV. Linguistically weak manuscripts will immediately be rejected (e.g., when the language is insufficient that one cannot be understood what the authors mean). The authors should pay attention to this matter before submitting their manuscripts, and it will assist the review process and publication if they are acceptable.
V. The editor will inspect the manuscript based on the manuscript selection criteria script and determine whether the manuscript is Accepted or Rejected. If the manuscript does not meet the selection criteria, it will be rejected, and the editor will send it back to the author. The authors are allowed to resend it to the journal after correcting the manuscript based on manuscript selection criteria. If the manuscript meets the selection criteria, the editor will forward it to the reviewers to be reviewed between the first received paper and the time to send it to the reviewers.
VI. There will be a minimum of two referees (reviewers) who will examine the paper. The reviewers will review the manuscript based on the Review Form and their expertise in the field of study. The review process takes about 3 - 4 weeks after the reviewer receives the manuscript, and the editor is responsible for the process.
VII. The reviews will be sent back to the editor whether accepted with major revision or accepted with minor revision or rejected. Based on two or three review results, the editor decides whether the manuscript is accepted with major revision or minor revision or rejected.
VIII. If the manuscript is accepted with minor revision, the author has to revise it within two weeks. If the manuscript is accepted with major revision, it has to be sent back to the reviewers.
IX. If the manuscript is accepted with minor revision, the author has to revise it within two weeks. If the manuscript is accepted with major revision, it has to be sent back to the reviewers.
X. After the layout process is done, the journal is ready to be published.
Authors Name and Affiliations
Write the Author(s) names without title and professional positions such as Prof, Dr, Production Manager, etc. Do not shorten your last/family name. Always give your First and Last names (Full Name). Write clear affiliation of all Authors. Affiliation includes name of department/unit, (faculty), name of university, address, country, including email address.
All manuscripts should not exceed 150 words and should describe the scope, hypothesis or rationale for the work and the main findings. Complete sentences, active verbs, and the abstract should be written in the past tense. Standard nomenclature should be used and abbreviations should be avoided.
Key words (3-5 words) should be provided below the Abstract to assist with indexing of the article. These should not duplicate key words from the title.
In Introduction, Authors should state the objectives of the work at the end of introduction section. Before the objective, Authors should provide an acceptable background, and very short literature survey in order to record the existing solutions/method, to show which is the best of previous researches, to show the main limitation of the previous researches, to show what do you hope to achieve, and to show the scientific merit or novelties of the paper. Avoid a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results. The introduction should clearly state the purpose of the paper.
Materials and Methods
This should be complete enough to provide enough detail to allow the work to be repeated by others. However, only truly new procedures should be described in detail; previously published procedures should be cited, and important amendments of published procedures should be mentioned briefly. Capitalize trade names and include the manufacturer’s name and address. Subheadings should be used. Methods in general use need not be described in detail.
Content /Result and Discussion
Content is the body of paper, consists of subtitle that representing the dialogue of the paper. Results should be clear and terse. The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail. The discussion should explore the consequence of the results of the work, not repeat them. A combined Results and Discussion section is often apposite. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature.
In discussion, it is the most significant section of your article. Here you get the chance to sell your data. Make the discussion corresponding to the results, but do not reiterate the results. Often should begin with a brief summary of the main scientific findings (not experimental results). The following components should be covered in the discussion: How do your results relate to the inventive question or objectives outlined in the Introduction section (what)? Do you provide interpretation systematically for each of your results or findings presented (why)? Are your results reliable with what other investigators have reported (what else)?
Conclusions should answer the objectives of the research. Without clear Conclusions, reviewers and readers will find it problematic to judge the work, and whether or not it merits publication in the journal. If an optional conclusion section is used, its content should not substantially duplicate the abstract.
The acknowledgments of people, grants, funds, etc should be brief.
Authors are guided to follow APA (American Psyhological Association) References style while submitting paper to Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research (JHSSR):
- Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A. & Berry, L. L. (1985). Problems and strategies in services marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49, 33-46.
- Brexendorf, T. O. & Kernstock, J. (2007). Corporate behavior vs. brand behavior: Towards an integrated view? Journal of Brand Management, 15(1), 32-40.
- King, J. (2011). Wrestling with the angel: A life of Janet Frame. Auckland, New Zealand: Viking.
Chapters in Book
- Helber, T. E. (2002). Redeveloping mature resorts for new markets. In M. V. Conlin & T. Baum (Eds.), Island tourism: Management principles and practice (pp. 100-120). Chichester, England: Wiley.
- Holmes, P. (2001). The intercultural communication experiences of ethnic Chinese students in a Western tertiary institution: Implications for education providers (Working paper 2000-14). Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato, Department of Management Communication.
- Shobhadevi, Y. J., & Bidarakoppa, G. S. (2015). Possession phenomena: As a coping behaviour. In G. Davidson (Ed.), Applying psychology: Lessons from Asia-Oceania (pp. 90-100). Carlton, Vic., Australia: Australian Psychological Society.
- Dewstow, R. A. (2006). Using the Internet to enhance teaching at the University of Waikato (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
From a webpage
Figure 4. Name of Picture. From [Adapted from] Title of webpage, by A. A. Author and B. B. Author, year, Retrieved from… website: http://…. Reprinted with permission.
Figures / Illustrations / Photographs
Graphics should be supplied as high resolution (at least 290-600 dp.i.) electronic files. All figures should be embedded within the manuscript, and must be captioned and numbered sequentially.
Tables and Equations
Tables and equations should not be submitted in a format exceeding the A4 page size. All tables should be embedded within the manuscript, and must be captioned and numbered sequentially. Tables should be self-explanatory without reference to the text.
Proofs will be sent via e-mail as an Acrobat PDF file (e-mail attachment) and should be returned within 3 days of receipt. Page proofs are considered to be the final version of the manuscript.
Submission Preparation Checklist
We recommend that you ask a colleague to read over your paper prior to submission to ensure it is of a high standard and obeys to a high level of scientific writing.
- The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
- The submission file is in Microsoft Word file format or Word Perfect.
- Manuscript has been made in the light of Journal’s author guidelines.
- The text has simple paragraph space; the size of source is 12 points; cursive is used instead of underlining (excepting URL directions); and all the illustrations, figures and tables are in a separate document and marking the corresponding spot within the text.
- Author(s) did not mention his or her name and affiliation in the main text.
- Author(s) has read all the terms and conditions of the journal.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work concurrently licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into distinct, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with an acknowledgement of its early publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to prolific exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used wholly for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
This journal charges the following Publication fees.
Article Submission: 0.00 (USD)
Authors are required to pay an Article Submission Fee as part of the submission process to contribute to review costs.
Article Publication: 120.00 (USD)
If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an Article Publication Fee to cover publications costs.
please contact the Editor-in-Chief. email@example.com